Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1996
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 2 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 57 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 1136 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 2254 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 465 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2626 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |