Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 45 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |