Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 engine produces 26 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 is smaller. Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4880 litres | 4130 litres | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 has 249 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`630 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`930 kg | 1`995 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 635 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. Therefore, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |