Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Seat Alhambra 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 19.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Alhambra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Vento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 45 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |