Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 44 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 415 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |