Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 30 HP less power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Kia Carnival. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 15 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 369 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |