Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Hyundai H1 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 21.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 34 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Hyundai H1. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 7.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 14.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 5.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 810 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 38 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 3295 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 307 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai H1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1585 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |