Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 229 NM | 226 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Voyager have the same engine power, but Chrysler Grand Voyager torque is 3 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.0 | |
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 27 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |