Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Opel Sintra 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 141 HP | |
Torque: | 229 NM | 202 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 6 HP more power than Opel Sintra, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Opel Sintra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.5 | |
The Opel Sintra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Sintra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Opel Sintra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used also on Opel Frontera | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 40 cm longer than the Opel Sintra, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3765 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Opel Sintra, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`345 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Opel Sintra has
| |