Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1996
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 31 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 49 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.3 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 57 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1136 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2254 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |