Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 229 NM | 226 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Voyager have the same engine power, but Chrysler Grand Voyager torque is 3 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.1 | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 27 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |