Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 151 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 4 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.6 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |