Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 23 HP less power than Mazda MPV, but torque is 22 NM more than Mazda MPV. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Mazda MPV, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |