Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 engine produces 4 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.0 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 is smaller. Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`525 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |