Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 19 HP less power than Mazda MPV, but torque is 22 NM more than Mazda MPV. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.1 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Mazda MPV, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`525 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |