Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 37 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Blazer) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.09 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 47 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 1903 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 1233 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`525 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |