Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 53 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 748 litres | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4550 litres | 2297 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 137 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2253 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`360 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |