Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 23 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 132 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 61 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |