Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Toyota Proace 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Grand Voyager) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Proace) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Proace, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Toyota Proace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.98 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Proace, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4550 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`973 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Toyota Proace has
| |