Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 43 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 102 NM less than Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 23 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 33 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4550 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 88 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2600 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`146 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |