Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 29 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 748 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space (by 135 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2713 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |