Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Mercedes Vito 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 74 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mercedes Vito. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.24 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 970 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes Vito has more luggage space. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 222 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |