Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Renault Trafic 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 10 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 1000 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | 2100 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 252 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2450 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |