Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Renault Trafic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 19 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 60 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.94 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 2150 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 1402 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |