Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Renault Trafic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 35 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 31 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 1240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 492 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |