Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Kia Carnival 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 50 HP less power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Carnival 2014 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Kia Carnival 2014 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.12 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 359 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4550 litres | 2335 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Kia Carnival may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2215 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`045 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |