Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Hyundai H1 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 34 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.93 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 851 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai H1 has more luggage space. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 103 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai H1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |