Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Dodge Grand Caravan 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Grand Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Grand Caravan) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 287 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 137 HP less power than Dodge Grand Caravan, but torque is 7 NM more than Dodge Grand Caravan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.8 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.73 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Grand Caravan, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 2359 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 2359 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 748 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4550 litres | 4072 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 478 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`744 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Grand Caravan has
| |