Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Chrysler Town & Country 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 172 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 5 HP less power than Chrysler Town & Country, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 12.5 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Town & Country, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is smaller, but higher. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 5 cm shorter than the Chrysler Town & Country, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 930 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 930 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 748 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4550 litres | 2340 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`585 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |