Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2003
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 253 HP | |
Torque: | 332 NM | 339 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Chrysler Pacifica is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 35 HP less power than Chrysler Pacifica, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chrysler Pacifica. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.3 | |
The Chrysler Pacifica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 87 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Chrysler Pacifica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 5.05 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 2.01 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler Pacifica, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 369 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 369 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2250 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1880 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |