Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 23 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 18 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 13.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 308 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2971 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`605 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |