Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 2 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 40 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 12.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 27 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`605 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |