Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Voyager 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 12 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 13.6 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`605 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |