Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 12 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 14.3 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 43 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 670 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 1233 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2960 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`605 | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |