Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Galaxy has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 193 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 - 360 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 - 12.8 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 12.7 | 6.5 - 9.8 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3296 litres | 2325 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 248 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 971 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`733 kg | ~ 2`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`093 kg | ~ 1`680 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 640 kg | ~ 780 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |