Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 193 HP | 140 - 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 - 360 NM | 218 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 - 12.8 seconds | 11 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 12.7 | 7.8 - 13.0 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3296 litres | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 (by 834 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`733 kg | ~ 2`579 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`093 kg | ~ 2`002 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 640 kg | ~ 577 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. Therefore, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |