Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 218 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 360 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 14.2 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 13.0 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 46 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 19 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 664 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`630 | ~ 1`956 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |