Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler Grand Voyager also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 3.0 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 178 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 325 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.8 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 14.2 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 307 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2971 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`519 | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |