Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 178 HP | 140 - 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 325 NM | 226 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.8 seconds | 11 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 14.2 | 7.7 - 13.0 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 is smaller. Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 4130 litres | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 has 249 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`519 | ~ 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |