Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Opel Sintra 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Opel Sintra can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 2.2 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 178 HP | 115 - 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 325 NM | 202 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.8 seconds | 10.8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 14.2 | 7.9 - 11.5 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Sintra. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Sintra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 40 cm longer than the Opel Sintra, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4880 litres | 3765 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 211 litres more trunk space than the Opel Sintra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Opel Sintra, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`519 kg | ~ 2`402 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`947 kg | ~ 1`705 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 572 kg | ~ 697 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Opel Sintra. Therefore, Opel Sintra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Opel Sintra has
| |