Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Blazer can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler Grand Voyager also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 178 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 325 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.8 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 14.2 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 45 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 1232 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2960 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`519 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |