Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Honda Accord 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 239 HP | 281 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 42 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 198 NM more than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.4 | |
| Chrysler 300C consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Accord) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 15 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 447 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300C has 15 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`472 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Honda Accord has
| |