Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Lexus LS 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 239 HP | 386 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 493 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Lexus LS is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 147 HP less power than Lexus LS, but torque is 47 NM more than Lexus LS. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.7 | |
|
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LS engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Grand Cherokee | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 5 cm shorter than the Lexus LS, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 48 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`472 | 2`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Lexus LS has
| |