Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Jaguar XF 2011

 
Chrysler 300C
2011 - 2014
Jaguar XF
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel5.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 239 HP385 HP
Torque: 540 NM515 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 seconds5.7 seconds
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving.
Chrysler 300C engine produces 146 HP less power than Jaguar XF, but torque is 25 NM more than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.511.1
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler 300C consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway890 km on highway
Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Jeep Grand CherokeeInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XK, Jaguar XJ
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Chrysler 300C engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 5.04 m4.96 m
Width: 1.90 m1.88 m
Height: 1.49 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 8 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 462 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
465 litresno data
Jaguar XF has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 78 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`4722`285
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 11 00010 400
Pros and Cons: Chrysler 300C has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Jaguar XF has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv