Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Jaguar XF 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 239 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300C engine produces 49 HP more power than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 5.4 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 8 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 78 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`472 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |