Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Honda Accord 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 281 HP | |
| Torque: | 358 NM | 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Honda Accord. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 15 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 447 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300C has 15 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`359 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Honda Accord has
| |