Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 358 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300C engine produces 38 HP more power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Chrysler 300M. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.7 | |
| Chrysler 300C consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 300C 2011 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 300C 2011 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler 300C is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 68 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300M (by 65 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`359 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |