Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Honda Accord 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 281 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300C engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Honda Accord. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.4 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Accord) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2011 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 300C 2011 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 15 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 447 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300C has 15 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`359 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Accord has
| |