Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Lexus ES 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300C engine produces 15 HP more power than Lexus ES, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Lexus ES. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.5 | |
|
The Lexus ES is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus ES, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Lexus ES) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 119 mm (4.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus ES can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Lexus ES version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2011 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 300C 2011 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 14 cm longer than the Lexus ES, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300C has 2 litres more trunk space than the Lexus ES. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`359 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Lexus ES has
| |