Chrysler 300C 2005 vs BMW 7 series 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
BMW 7 series is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 27 HP less power than BMW 7 series, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW 7 series. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 7 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 7 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 7 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 7 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 7 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine BMW 7 sērija 2008 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter. The ... More about BMW 7 sērija 2008 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is smaller, but slightly higher. Chrysler 300C is 19 cm shorter than the BMW 7 series, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300C has 4 litres more trunk space than the BMW 7 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 7 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
BMW 7 sērija has
| |